Ace the ACCA Business Law Challenge 2025 – Unlock Success and Rule the Corporate World!

In negligence claims, the standard of care expected is that of reasonable care. This means that individuals and entities are required to act in a manner that a reasonably prudent person would under similar circumstances. The concept of reasonable care is a fundamental principle in tort law, which aims to prevent harm by ensuring that individuals take appropriate precautions to avoid causing injury to others.

When assessing whether reasonable care has been exercised, courts typically consider factors such as the likelihood of harm, the severity of potential harm, and the burden of taking precautions to prevent that harm. If it is determined that an individual or entity did not meet this standard and this failure resulted in injury or damage, they may be found liable for negligence.

The other options relate to different aspects of law. Strict liability involves holding someone responsible for damages irrespective of fault or intention, which does not apply in the context of negligence. Substantial performance is a concept more relevant to contract law rather than tort law, as it involves the completion of a contract despite minor defects. Vicarious liability pertains to the legal responsibility of one party for the negligent actions of another, typically in an employer-employee relationship, rather than the standard of care expected in negligence cases.